38 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

The Espionage Act is blatantly unconstitutional and should have been struck down by the Supreme Court back in 1913…..and here we are today, censorship, surveillance, and punishment for truth telling.

Expand full comment

1913, infamous for the creation of the Fed.... there are no coincidences.

Expand full comment

The Fed, where Private Bankers, heavily weighted to the Privileged few, create money and credit, incur debt guaranteed by the American Public.

From whence Too Big to Fail/Jail was hatched.

Expand full comment

Even before that we were never "free," except for maybe about 20 years or so after the war with England. But we're STILL under the "Crown." The Crown Corporation, and the British Crown is under the Crown Corporation! It's all about these gd globalist psychopaths running everything with their 90% of the world's wealth! Time for them to GO.

Expand full comment

well said, dark times indeed :-((

Expand full comment

We live in a Nazi dystopia.

Expand full comment

zionist dystopia.

Expand full comment

FASCIST DYSTOPIA. That covers all those fuckers!

Expand full comment

not really. the original meaning of fascist was anti communist. This is true today, antifa (anti fascist) are communists.

Expand full comment

Okay. I disagree, mostly b/c Antifa was infiltrated and destroyed. But— you win. Now can we agree that the mutherfukkers that are committing genocide need to be stopped? Good. What does “liberal” mean? What does “conservative” mean? The answers illustrate my point, that language fuckery (how’s that word for ya, I like it!) is a very common and effective tool of the current regime, whenever, wherever. A kinda really OLD tool, too.

Expand full comment

no problem. We agree on the essential. What words actually mean is important. And yes, word fuckery is used by the reptilians all the time. For example constantly repeating that the U.S. is a democracy.

the curious thing to me is that communism and zionism are never mentioned. It is always nazi and fascist. The bolshevik revolution and who and what was behind that, the red terrors one and two, the holodomor, the great leap forward, the gulags, Katyn forest, pol pot and more are never mentioned. the only things that are driven into minds is always, the holocaust and nazi and fascist.

Expand full comment

By coincidence, Julian Macfarlane's essay yesterday, "Russia's 911" looks in passing at the Holodomor. The principle topic, of course, is the Sevastopol Beach attack.

https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/russias-911

Expand full comment

But I HAVE been seeing the term “Zionism” flying around quite a bit, actually. Lately. VERY lately. Because it has a less clear meaning, perhaps, as it is associated with JEWS, the Mt. Zion and so forth… There has LONG been an effort to blame the Jews for everything, including their own genocide. Most Jews are NOT Zionists.

Expand full comment

read the talmud. read the history of the Balfour declaration. Read about jews being kicked out of 109 countries.

Expand full comment

I am not anti-Jew. I’m aware of their struggle.

Expand full comment

True. And why do the Overlords (there’s a term) always go to these very very simplistic terms, we might ask. I’d say so they can keep things very BASIC, so that the tactic of Divide and Conquer is easier for them to accomplish, and maybe some other reasons, too.

Expand full comment

the destruction of western civilization is multi pronged.

Expand full comment

THAT is the understatement of the year, lol.

Expand full comment

If they're communists they're full-bore neoliberal and neoconservative communists. So I take it the likes of Gates, Bezos, Schwab, Pfizer, Blackrock, Lockheed are communists...NAFTA and the Crash were orchestrated by the Commies too, of course.

Expand full comment

Hi Jenny

Talk about a ziopathic dystopia. AIPAC spent, I believe, $15 million to defeat Rep. Jamaal Bowman in his NY district. Just fucking disgraceful.

George Lattimer, the Zio yes-man who won, has to be the most physically ugly man I have ever laid my unfortunate eyes on. I’d be truly ashamed to have him represent me. Yes, it’s that bad.

Expand full comment

Just had a look Gypsy..............rug on his head/bad breath and a carpet salesman!

Expand full comment

Jenny, you would NEVER buy carpet from this man! 😂

Expand full comment

Ha. OK

Expand full comment

Say it as it is my dear ..........thanks for the laugh. I am not sure what he looks like. I will go and look.

Expand full comment

not really. more like a communist zionist dystopia. You'll have nothing is a communist idea. Abolishing private property is the first plank in the communist manifesto.

Expand full comment

It's also a plank in the GLOBALIST "manifesto." Do you think the Globalists are "communist"? And for that matter, "Communist" once meant sharing amongst the people, like you know, a COMMUNE would do? So... I stand by my original comment that REGIMES tend to twist up the jargon so that people are confused and don't know who/what they're actually supporting. It's just a tactic, like wearing the uniforms of the "enemy" and then doing something despicable to your own people so they will be blamed.

Expand full comment

not one single commune has ever worked anywhere. There are always people who won't do their share, like bernie sanders, who was kicked out of a commune for being too lazy. the entire concept of communism is anti human nature. However it appeals to the young and idealistic. I understand that.

I stand by my comment that words mean something. And yes, I believe that the globalists are communists. They like all tyrants use communism because it appeals to the gullible.

Expand full comment

I’m not interested in communes, I was simply talking about the root of the word. But communism is about what a govt. does. The people that want to literally RULE the world aren’t interested in being a “government,” no “GOVERNING,” but a totalitarian SLAVE camp for just a few, and nobody owns ANYTHING, and they get their brains chipped, or surgically altered, or altered by drugs… whatever. We’re talking about a tyranny to end all tyrannies. That’s what I’m concerned with. That’s what is coming if the Globalists succeed. I don’t think they will, but there’s gonna be HELL if we don’t stop them pretty soon. They’ve already begun, if you’re paying attention.

Expand full comment

of course.

Expand full comment

The Globalists are NOT Communist they are facist. Read about communism?

Expand full comment

opinions vary. read Solzhenitsyn, gramsci, alinsky, Understand that you’ll own nothing is communist.

Expand full comment

Wilson.

Does it occur to you that owning nothing means you are more free?

Expand full comment

it occurred to me that private property is the foundation of liberty. If you wish to own nothing that is your right.

Expand full comment

NO. The more you own the more you want which is why the US is crumbling. It's called greed.

Expand full comment

the US is crumbling for a variety of reasons. Greedy oligarchs is one reason. The oligarchs want to own everything. You will own nothing, the globo homos will own everything. If that is your choice that's fine. It isn't my choice.

Expand full comment

off topic, but i see you are a menzie. my grandmother's maiden name was menzie [from weem, scotland, but settled in rochester, NY], my middle name is menzie, and our son's 1st name is menzie. it is rare for us to uncover a 'menzie' w/out the final 's'. apologies for the personal remark, scott. you are, like assange, a truthsayer and like him, one of my longtime, most enduring heroes

Expand full comment

Yeah, people usually add an s onto the end; never really researched my genealogy but my grandparents lived in NJ (as did my parents/me) and I had a great-grandfather named Schmidt. That’s all I can remember.

Expand full comment

Spot on!

Expand full comment