Okay. I disagree, mostly b/c Antifa was infiltrated and destroyed. ButтАФ you win. Now can we agree that the mutherfukkers that are committing genocide need to be stopped? Good. What does тАЬliberalтАЭ mean? What does тАЬconservativeтАЭ mean? The answers illustrate my point, that language fuckery (howтАЩs that word for ya, I like it!) is a very common and effective tool of the current regime, whenever, wherever. A kinda really OLD tool, too.
no problem. We agree on the essential. What words actually mean is important. And yes, word fuckery is used by the reptilians all the time. For example constantly repeating that the U.S. is a democracy.
the curious thing to me is that communism and zionism are never mentioned. It is always nazi and fascist. The bolshevik revolution and who and what was behind that, the red terrors one and two, the holodomor, the great leap forward, the gulags, Katyn forest, pol pot and more are never mentioned. the only things that are driven into minds is always, the holocaust and nazi and fascist.
By coincidence, Julian Macfarlane's essay yesterday, "Russia's 911" looks in passing at the Holodomor. The principle topic, of course, is the Sevastopol Beach attack.
But I HAVE been seeing the term тАЬZionismтАЭ flying around quite a bit, actually. Lately. VERY lately. Because it has a less clear meaning, perhaps, as it is associated with JEWS, the Mt. Zion and so forthтАж There has LONG been an effort to blame the Jews for everything, including their own genocide. Most Jews are NOT Zionists.
True. And why do the Overlords (thereтАЩs a term) always go to these very very simplistic terms, we might ask. IтАЩd say so they can keep things very BASIC, so that the tactic of Divide and Conquer is easier for them to accomplish, and maybe some other reasons, too.
If they're communists they're full-bore neoliberal and neoconservative communists. So I take it the likes of Gates, Bezos, Schwab, Pfizer, Blackrock, Lockheed are communists...NAFTA and the Crash were orchestrated by the Commies too, of course.
Talk about a ziopathic dystopia. AIPAC spent, I believe, $15 million to defeat Rep. Jamaal Bowman in his NY district. Just fucking disgraceful.
George Lattimer, the Zio yes-man who won, has to be the most physically ugly man I have ever laid my unfortunate eyes on. IтАЩd be truly ashamed to have him represent me. Yes, itтАЩs that bad.
not really. more like a communist zionist dystopia. You'll have nothing is a communist idea. Abolishing private property is the first plank in the communist manifesto.
It's also a plank in the GLOBALIST "manifesto." Do you think the Globalists are "communist"? And for that matter, "Communist" once meant sharing amongst the people, like you know, a COMMUNE would do? So... I stand by my original comment that REGIMES tend to twist up the jargon so that people are confused and don't know who/what they're actually supporting. It's just a tactic, like wearing the uniforms of the "enemy" and then doing something despicable to your own people so they will be blamed.
not one single commune has ever worked anywhere. There are always people who won't do their share, like bernie sanders, who was kicked out of a commune for being too lazy. the entire concept of communism is anti human nature. However it appeals to the young and idealistic. I understand that.
I stand by my comment that words mean something. And yes, I believe that the globalists are communists. They like all tyrants use communism because it appeals to the gullible.
IтАЩm not interested in communes, I was simply talking about the root of the word. But communism is about what a govt. does. The people that want to literally RULE the world arenтАЩt interested in being a тАЬgovernment,тАЭ no тАЬGOVERNING,тАЭ but a totalitarian SLAVE camp for just a few, and nobody owns ANYTHING, and they get their brains chipped, or surgically altered, or altered by drugsтАж whatever. WeтАЩre talking about a tyranny to end all tyrannies. ThatтАЩs what IтАЩm concerned with. ThatтАЩs what is coming if the Globalists succeed. I donтАЩt think they will, but thereтАЩs gonna be HELL if we donтАЩt stop them pretty soon. TheyтАЩve already begun, if youтАЩre paying attention.
the US is crumbling for a variety of reasons. Greedy oligarchs is one reason. The oligarchs want to own everything. You will own nothing, the globo homos will own everything. If that is your choice that's fine. It isn't my choice.
We live in a Nazi dystopia.
zionist dystopia.
FASCIST DYSTOPIA. That covers all those fuckers!
not really. the original meaning of fascist was anti communist. This is true today, antifa (anti fascist) are communists.
Okay. I disagree, mostly b/c Antifa was infiltrated and destroyed. ButтАФ you win. Now can we agree that the mutherfukkers that are committing genocide need to be stopped? Good. What does тАЬliberalтАЭ mean? What does тАЬconservativeтАЭ mean? The answers illustrate my point, that language fuckery (howтАЩs that word for ya, I like it!) is a very common and effective tool of the current regime, whenever, wherever. A kinda really OLD tool, too.
no problem. We agree on the essential. What words actually mean is important. And yes, word fuckery is used by the reptilians all the time. For example constantly repeating that the U.S. is a democracy.
the curious thing to me is that communism and zionism are never mentioned. It is always nazi and fascist. The bolshevik revolution and who and what was behind that, the red terrors one and two, the holodomor, the great leap forward, the gulags, Katyn forest, pol pot and more are never mentioned. the only things that are driven into minds is always, the holocaust and nazi and fascist.
By coincidence, Julian Macfarlane's essay yesterday, "Russia's 911" looks in passing at the Holodomor. The principle topic, of course, is the Sevastopol Beach attack.
https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/russias-911
But I HAVE been seeing the term тАЬZionismтАЭ flying around quite a bit, actually. Lately. VERY lately. Because it has a less clear meaning, perhaps, as it is associated with JEWS, the Mt. Zion and so forthтАж There has LONG been an effort to blame the Jews for everything, including their own genocide. Most Jews are NOT Zionists.
read the talmud. read the history of the Balfour declaration. Read about jews being kicked out of 109 countries.
I am not anti-Jew. IтАЩm aware of their struggle.
True. And why do the Overlords (thereтАЩs a term) always go to these very very simplistic terms, we might ask. IтАЩd say so they can keep things very BASIC, so that the tactic of Divide and Conquer is easier for them to accomplish, and maybe some other reasons, too.
the destruction of western civilization is multi pronged.
THAT is the understatement of the year, lol.
If they're communists they're full-bore neoliberal and neoconservative communists. So I take it the likes of Gates, Bezos, Schwab, Pfizer, Blackrock, Lockheed are communists...NAFTA and the Crash were orchestrated by the Commies too, of course.
Hi Jenny
Talk about a ziopathic dystopia. AIPAC spent, I believe, $15 million to defeat Rep. Jamaal Bowman in his NY district. Just fucking disgraceful.
George Lattimer, the Zio yes-man who won, has to be the most physically ugly man I have ever laid my unfortunate eyes on. IтАЩd be truly ashamed to have him represent me. Yes, itтАЩs that bad.
Just had a look Gypsy..............rug on his head/bad breath and a carpet salesman!
Jenny, you would NEVER buy carpet from this man! ЁЯШВ
Ha. OK
Say it as it is my dear ..........thanks for the laugh. I am not sure what he looks like. I will go and look.
not really. more like a communist zionist dystopia. You'll have nothing is a communist idea. Abolishing private property is the first plank in the communist manifesto.
It's also a plank in the GLOBALIST "manifesto." Do you think the Globalists are "communist"? And for that matter, "Communist" once meant sharing amongst the people, like you know, a COMMUNE would do? So... I stand by my original comment that REGIMES tend to twist up the jargon so that people are confused and don't know who/what they're actually supporting. It's just a tactic, like wearing the uniforms of the "enemy" and then doing something despicable to your own people so they will be blamed.
not one single commune has ever worked anywhere. There are always people who won't do their share, like bernie sanders, who was kicked out of a commune for being too lazy. the entire concept of communism is anti human nature. However it appeals to the young and idealistic. I understand that.
I stand by my comment that words mean something. And yes, I believe that the globalists are communists. They like all tyrants use communism because it appeals to the gullible.
IтАЩm not interested in communes, I was simply talking about the root of the word. But communism is about what a govt. does. The people that want to literally RULE the world arenтАЩt interested in being a тАЬgovernment,тАЭ no тАЬGOVERNING,тАЭ but a totalitarian SLAVE camp for just a few, and nobody owns ANYTHING, and they get their brains chipped, or surgically altered, or altered by drugsтАж whatever. WeтАЩre talking about a tyranny to end all tyrannies. ThatтАЩs what IтАЩm concerned with. ThatтАЩs what is coming if the Globalists succeed. I donтАЩt think they will, but thereтАЩs gonna be HELL if we donтАЩt stop them pretty soon. TheyтАЩve already begun, if youтАЩre paying attention.
of course.
The Globalists are NOT Communist they are facist. Read about communism?
opinions vary. read Solzhenitsyn, gramsci, alinsky, Understand that youтАЩll own nothing is communist.
Wilson.
Does it occur to you that owning nothing means you are more free?
it occurred to me that private property is the foundation of liberty. If you wish to own nothing that is your right.
NO. The more you own the more you want which is why the US is crumbling. It's called greed.
the US is crumbling for a variety of reasons. Greedy oligarchs is one reason. The oligarchs want to own everything. You will own nothing, the globo homos will own everything. If that is your choice that's fine. It isn't my choice.