Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Karen Nyhus's avatar

Do you really think that, "Had the Iraqis come clean about their missile program in 1991, it may have set in motion events that could have led to the lifting of sanctions, and the prevention of the US-led invasion in 2003."? That would imply that the U S. (excuse me -- "coalition") invasion was about WMD, about finding and destroying them.

Don'tcha think the Americans just saw an opening to ruthlessly accelerate their "middle east" agenda, much as the Israelis do right now, with their Zionist agenda?

I mean, it'd be nice to think that. But I don't. Which is why I don't think that this oversight is responsible for what ensued. They threw you out of the country, remember?

Hey, btw: could you please write about the inter-war* period -- the Clinton administration "no fly zones?" I remember them (the Americans, I mean) bombing water infrastructure on Iraq (not to mention the only pharmaceutical plant in Sudan, also named al Shifa -- was that bad intel, or genocide lite? Are we that stupid?). Seem to have gone down the memory hole. Thanks.

* I have always considered there to have been *three* U.S. "gulf wars" -- Desert Shield, the U.S. bombings and control of airspace in between (kindof a one-sided war, I guess), and Desert Storm. What think?

Expand full comment
Thomas H. Greco, Jr.'s avatar

Scott, thank you for another fascinating story and for coming clean about what really happened :"I was decorated for helping kill SCUDs when none had been killed." That is further evidence that our government routinely emits propaganda to manipulate people emotionally and to shape public opinion. You are on my list of trusted sources that I suggest to readers of my own website and newsletter. Thanks also for giving us a widow to reality of the situations in the middle-east and eastern Europe.

Expand full comment
67 more comments...

No posts